I love when someone who doesn't know anything about constitutional law runs their mouth at me on Twitter. "Step into my parlor," said the spider to the fly :) https://twitter.com/vyodaiken/status/1428079938415079424 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cmuratori
Yes, sure Marsh v. Alabama applies to twitter. Well done. I think these giant platforms *should* be regulated as public utilities, but they are not. Maybe wave your arms faster.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vyodaiken @cmuratori
I am so torn on this. The concept of a platform is important to encourage innovation and development of new web software as a service and content oriented systems. However there needs to be a clear distinction between a platform, publisher, or whatever they now are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I would be fine with just saying that services can choose whether they are a publisher or not - publisher means they can moderate, but they are also liable for copyright infringement etc., non-publisher means they cannot moderate but they are not liable.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.