Much like the people here pushing the vaccine, the people against the vaccine _also_ don't know what they're talking about, but _both_ are what I would call "instinctively correct". They average out to a system that makes reasonable survival decisions.
The _reasons_ people give for _either_ choice, however, seem very suspect to me and I suspect they are mostly post-hoc explanations, not the real reasons why people did or didn't do something.
-
-
This is actually true of most decisions, I think - most of the time people didn't actually start with an open mind and then do something on the weight of the evidence. Usually they picked one or another thing, and then later they say something about why, but it is not causal.
-
So while some people who refuse to be vaccinated _may_ have a sound, logical case for doing so, I wouldn't imagine _most_ do not. But the _same_ is true for those who choose _to_ be vaccinate - some actually took the time to reason through it, but most did not.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.