I don't have any anti-vax complaints myself, since I think the mRNA vaccines on the measure are pretty good. But I also spent a lot of time researching them, _and_ would not zealously push them because there's a lot about them we still don't know.
It's just a measure of institutional trust, which is understandably at low levels. I'm not sure it really goes any further than that for most people. But calling people names when they don't agree with a systemic pronouncement is extremely unproductive regardless of your view.
-
-
I agree it's institutional trust. I just wanted to understand if there is any validity to antivax given your challenge, I thought you had good criticism. But then imo your point was we need to understand to defend it, and I also disagree (proof of burden to antivaxers imo).
-
Burden of proof I mean
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.