if you can't get it for health reasons you should be a fucking vocal proponent of the vaccine so everyone else gets it, if you arent then you are just a dumbass
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @TylerGlaiel @davidroman0O
Would you be interested in taking my Pro Vax Challenge? This is where I ask people who are rabidly pro-vaccine a series of technical questions about the vaccine and the research behind it to see if they have any idea what they're talking about.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
My assumption, of course, is that they do not, and they are equally ignorant to the people who are anti-vaccine, but I am always happy to be surprised!
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
And what’s the point of the challenge?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
To see whether people who push the vaccine have taken the time to understand the consequences, or if they are actually just randomly doing so because they read something on the internet. Exactly the same as the inverse test you might do for someone pushing anti-vaccine sentiment.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
idk is this gonna be asking me to cite studies or obscure technical details that are irrelevant to whether it works or not, or just stuff that actually should be general knowledge?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Strictly technical details, and only those that implicate our knowledge of whether or not it is safe to receive. It would include things like knowing all of the things that have and have not been tested for safety, the history of vaccine safety, the protocol design, etc.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @TylerGlaiel and
Why? When virtually every (credible) medical professional around is pushing the vaccine, I think you can trust that. Are you forgetting about credibility here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IFollowTechStu1 @TylerGlaiel and
My entire career is basically about repeatedly discovering that 99% of people who work in technical professions have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. So no, credibility counts for absolutely nothing. Most historical consensuses proved to be wrong or unfounded.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
It is always critical to independently verify before zealously advocating, otherwise you really shouldn't be zealous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.