Inspired by @cmuratori recent Windows Terminal demo, here's 10x editing a 1GB file at 3000fps.
https://www.10xeditor.com/ pic.twitter.com/vd3kkBPHto
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @stewartlynch8 @cmuratori
Too bad it's proprietary software.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This obsession with open source is not really that useful. Lots of overly praised open source software is just poor quality.
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
That could be said for all software. At least open source software allows for improvements to be made by all.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Does not pan out in reality. You must assume the hivemind is smart. My experience tells me the opposite. A team of two or three people dedicating their time to a product over the span of years will produce a higher quality than a bazaar of randos.
4 replies 0 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @wisam910 @Deltabeard and
Bad programmers produce bad quality code regardless of it being open-source or not. There are many great OSS projects with hundreds of contributors. Accepting bad code isn't mandatory.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Accepting bad code is not mandatory. But reviewing it in order to refuse takes time. And then you have to explain why you refused, which also takes time. Anf you don’t do all of that, people will start saying bad things about your software affecting its reputation.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The notion that code must be reviewed is just odd to me. Even offensive. Most of code review comments I've seen are just about style, hardly ever about substance.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Take a look at “Facts and Fallacies of Software Development” Robert L Glass, where it is clearly shown based on multiple researches and examples how p2p code reviews are one of the most efficient ways to eliminate bugs and bad design earlier.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The problem with this kind of "research", however, is that nobody has explained why there is so much terrible design and bug-ridden software shipped by companies that do exactly these practices.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
If the argument is that, say, Google is shipping "slightly less buggy and slightly better designed, but still terrible" software because they mandate lots of code reviews, I would say, well, then we need to figure out something else, because "slightly" isn't good enough.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.