I have updated termbench to v2. It now attempts to run four standard tests and provide a composite number. This version is also designed to be compilable on Linux and Mac, although it needs more testing on those platforms:https://github.com/cmuratori/termbench …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @cmuratori
Oh boy. None of my terminals here (gnome-terminal, konsole, xterm, rxvt) qualify as "reasonably fast" by that metric :( xterm is thoroughly disappointing; mrxvt is fast, but displays the attribute test incorrectly; the "big" desktops' terminals are meh. (clang 10.0.0, -O3)pic.twitter.com/06BPhe25ag
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BenchmarkPoof @cmuratori
I don't understand where this is going. Do you mean that the terminal apps are slow? (That's what I'd expect.) Or do you imply that the PTY layer is slow? If so, why? From what I understand, it should be considerably more lightweight than Windows' conhost/ConPTY, or isn't it?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
And this is all already in the README, and we even specifically say we have not done Linux testing so those numbers are for Windows.pic.twitter.com/ZlGvVA6aZa
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.