I think it would be a good idea for any terminal claiming to be "fast" to be able to run "termbench_release_clang large" cleanly, and with a TermMarkV2 of no less than 0.1gb/s.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I ran this on mac m1 through iterm2 ssh'd into linux and a very beefy CPU. results seem not that goodpic.twitter.com/XVNGWwXUms
-
Yeah, that is not good at all. But, that is not that atypical. Most terminals seem very slow, from what I've seen :(
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Tested on xubuntu, running on Alacritty through tmux. Performed 2 tests with the terminal window visible vs. invisible.pic.twitter.com/6tPGyW7zA5
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For linux: kitty terminal on the left, Konsole on the right. Both running small test, Kitty is much faster.pic.twitter.com/DBr4ghQjxs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get 0.64gb/s on default mode if I sink the output to /dev/null or comment out the write call. Seems to be the "speed of light" for the benchmark.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't build it; listing the build version requirements would be helpful.
-
I didn't think there were any? Maybe 64-bit? What is the build error you're getting?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for making it work on mac! Just tried it. Compiled with `clang termbench.cpp` without any special flags. Ran `./a.out small` Obviously the builtin terminal has abysmal performance!pic.twitter.com/wpwYHyVrdd
-
Kitty result is not any better. Although visually the animations seemed smoother. Again this is just the small test. Without passing `small` the test runs for a veeeery long time.pic.twitter.com/KdjTIqDCJr
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.