Er, why would 1,000 out of 20,000 be a surprising result for a vaccine billed as being 95% effective? What were they expecting?https://twitter.com/rkhamsi/status/1416163271904727046 …
So like, at least in my mind, that means that I don't take 1,000 out of 20,000 to be surprising number. I mean sure, probably not all 20,000 people would get infected unvaccinated, but like - look at those photos! It's probably close :)
-
-
So like, 1,000 out of 20,000 is still the right order-of-magnitude for me _even if_ everyone had been vaccinated, such that I wouldn't expect anyone to be super shocked if it happened, you know?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.