I always assumed that they were legally prohibited by some international law from adding anything to C++ that was useful to an actual programmer programming a computer. Is that not true?
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
we got "auto" and then they made sure something like that could never happen again
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @TylerGlaiel
Someone was probably hauled into the Hague for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
some reflection stuff is slated for C++24 I just assume its gonna be so basic and low level so it can be completely useless until they make a new keyword entirely to "try" and do it right in C++27
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @TylerGlaiel
C++ is a write-off. It's the COBOL of the 21st century. It'll be around for a long time due to legacy overhang, but it's such a POS it will be fully replaced for any new codebases as easly as this decade, I suspect.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
rust seems to be taking off, I haven't looked that deeply into it yet but it definitely appears to be the closest anyone's gotten to "dethroning C++"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TylerGlaiel
I can't say Rust looks promising, but the fact that anyone bothered to create it is. People needed to think "hey maybe we should write some languages where we don't assume you want an interpreter and a GC", and so now we're seeing that happen more, which is crucial.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
yeah I mean every time I've looked into it I just get to the borrow checker stuff and every example is like "here's the 100 lines you need to appease the borrow checker to do this thing that would be a one liner in C". neat concepts I guess.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @TylerGlaiel
It's not a good language, pretty much period (NO I DO NOT NEED YOU TO COME HERE AND TELL ME ABOUT IT RUST PROGRAMMERS, THANK YOU). But I think the _trend_ is good, and there are lots of these sorts of languages being worked on now, so I'm hopefully we'll get something soon.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @TylerGlaiel
I'm now obligated to ask (and sorry if you've already heard this far too many times) if you're in Jon Blow's beta and how much of a step in the right direction it is. (Number of steps is a signed int, on the off-chance you don't like it.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I am not in the beta, I don't have a strong opinion about it, but it is obviously much better than Rust to say the least.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.