Like, even the VICE _headline_ contains a factual error, or at least, as close to a factual error as you can have in a headline where there is no supporting context for clarification. It's just so frustrating.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really enjoyed the Google v. Oracle videos you made.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you plan to cover the Apple vs Epic and Wolfire vs Valve at some point? I know they just started, just curious :)
-
If they make it to SCOTUS, yes. If the parties bail before then, no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@casecontroversy is a gem. I've never seen anything like it. It's so rare to find someone that actually takes the time to *do the work*.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Too early to say, but obviously that depends on your metrics. I prefer justices that interpret laws as directly as possible, as opposed to broadly. Thus I would say Gorsuch and Coney Barrett are promising thus far, while Kavanaugh is not, but that is a very preliminary guess.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.