I strongly urge you to read this piece. It points less to a lab-grown theory and more to a "fuck, these kinds of viruses are likely quite prevalent in general." https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/sars-cov-2-looks-like-a-hybrid-of-viruses-from-two-different-species/ …
-
-
I don't know if Ars does retractions/corrections, but if you'd like to update your publication with correct information feel free to e-mail me at casey@mollyrocket.com and I can walk you through the relevant papers and point you to the people who wrote them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not sure where "collapsed" figures into it; I know *another* ancestral virus has entered the conversation as of late July: https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-circulating-bats-decades.html … ... this is NOT my section (and be glad for that), but you can email any findings you'd like to our science team.
-
Well, I would highly recommend reading the entire article Jon posted :) A lot of this stuff you are posting is outdated. It has been weird reading these "science" articles that seem completely unaware of the myriad publications casting significant doubt on their premises.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.