Stick with std::vector. The bugs are worked out.
-
-
And of course I didn't even mention the case where you don't need the count at all. So for example, if you knew that you always have the same number of points as normals, well that's completely impossible with std, because you can't have one count for two pointers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One size fits all tool will never fit anyone perfectly. How should a faster alternative to std::vector look like then? Implementing an array that fits your specific need is one thing, but I'm having a hard time imagining a faster generic version.
-
Maybe that is your answer then. Make one that fits you needs!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.