I'm certainly sympathetic to the argument that tech execs should be paid less because they simple aren't worth it, but that is very different from suggesting that somehow it would make a substantial difference in their workers' wages (it basically never would).
-
-
The one thing we _can't_ do is continue to pretend that someone the current costs are reasonable.
-
If anyone is interested, this 100 page report by the Word Bank dives a little bit on the implementation of the Brazilian health system 30 years ago. It’s downsides and upsides. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266969625_Twenty_Years_of_Health_System_Reform_in_Brazil_An_Assessment_of_the_Sistema_Unico_de_Saude … I haven't read everything yet, but it might bring some ideas to the debate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And another problem is that people like to pretend that universal healthcare means that we have to pay for all current healthcare _plus_ the entire universal bill (double counting). When in reality, obviously the current $3.5 trillion/yr could be applied toward part of the cost.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.