There's really nothing weird about that, and the only real argument you can have about it is what C should be. It's obviously _possible_ that C should be 0, but it does seem more likely that it is some non-zero value, since there are a lot more of them :)
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Boo hoo
End of conversation
-
-
-
Doesn’t the dynamic value of money due to inflation and the fact that it must somehow be funded by tax revenue complicate the matter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO Universal basic income should be implemented as f'(?) = max(f(?), C)
-
But then you would create a wealthfare trap, because when working for anything less than C, you might as well not work at all
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.