So I have some thoughts about the @DouthatNYT opinion piece, the first being that "redistribution" implies that sex is both quantifiable and a commodity, neither of which is true.https://twitter.com/calebecarma/status/991709484035780609 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Which brings me to another point. Incels seem to have a very narrow view of sexuality. Every incel article I've seen is implicitly heteronormative. They also seem to assume certain standards of attractiveness. They're limiting their choice set...
Non-consentual sex is rape. Sex is not a commodity. Redistribution of sex is therefore neither practical nor moral. But if incels are worried about their options in a sexual free market, they would do well to relax their limitations on choice of partners.
Incels who really value sex at all costs can merely have sex with one another. Demand, meet supply. By limiting their options, incels aren't "involuntarily celibate" at all. They're just trying to rape women they find attractive. Pretending they have a point is complicity.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.