Sigh....
Write three times a week for a dozen years, likely more than a million words of deep nuance on the topic, and my "whole shtick" is reduced by a blue check to "the federal government shouldn't spend money on infrastructure."
Ridiculous, yet revealing, take. twitter.com/Noahpinion/sta
Conversation
This later response illuminates this. I consider to be a YIMBY org, and lots of YIMBYs love our stuff, but there is a certain type of big project, top-down YIMBY that paints our commitment to incremental as reactionary instead of humility.
twitter.com/Noahpinion/sta
This Tweet is unavailable.
2
1
52
And then there is this. Without even grading on a Twitter curve (where I've gotten in a couple squabbles, not nothing "nasty" or really even "contentious"), is this for real?
twitter.com/Noahpinion/sta
This Tweet is unavailable.
3
26
Here's a Twitter counterpoint, from a non blue check, suggesting a question for someone who interviewed me this morning.
I think this goes to the problem. The Infrastructure Cult, esp economists, don't get the local dimensions of infrastructure spending.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @MarkLutter and @clmarohn
How has Strong Towns built an organization that is not red, blue, or even purple?
I'd say that ST comes across as its own brand that doesn't fit any easy category because it is just Strong Towns.
2
26
It's all reduced to either (a) Washington DC-centric political calculus, or (b) a bean counting exercise based on macro economic theory and measurements of success.
In that world, makes no sense.
But, THAT'S NOT THE REAL WORLD (even less than Twitter is).
1
23
Instead of link to a thousand articles, I'll just do this...
seems to suggest that we're not overbuilding our infrastructure.
twitter.com/Noahpinion/sta
Here's how I answer that in part 2 of a series I wrote on the American Jobs Plan.
strongtowns.org/journal/2021/4
This Tweet is unavailable.
2
13
And if federal spending alone could solve this, then why isn't the largest and most aggressive transportation spending package in my lifetime incapable of fixing more than 12% of highways in poor condition?
Or more than 22% of bridges in disrepair.
2
3
33
Only in a blue check, beltway-centric world is being pro-substantive reform seen as the same as saying "the federal government shouldn't spend money on infrastructure."
The federal gov't needs to spend a ton more, just not on the same legacy programs.
2
1
25
What national economists don't grasp is what every mayor intuitively knows.
"The federal government owns no infrastructure. Whatever they pay to build, they are paying it for someone else to own and maintain."
Here's my "nasty" advice to local leaders:
1
3
33
GIF
read image description
ALT
1
3


