This might be true in some places, but only because land values are artificially high (due to the huge increment of development). Development of random towers stagnates markets and makes them regulatory-centric, not demand-centric.
Quote Tweet
2. If the increment’s too low, it wouldn’t spur much redevelopment anyway, since in most markets, developers won't foot the cost of demo’ing an SFH to build a triplex.
Show this thread
