Tanvi Madan@tanvi_madan·May 31, 20171/ In a word: no. Delhi doesn't think China will curb IOR ambitions if no quad. Its view re latter shaped by few different things61410
Christopher Clary@clary_co·May 31, 2017I think ultimately the OBOR stance and the Quad stance are in tension. Now maybe the argument is given OBOR, Quad is too much.213
Christopher Clary@clary_coBut you don't improve Australia and US reliability by being so fickle yourself in preliminary maneuvers to form a balancing coalition.11:45 PM · May 31, 20172 Likes
Christopher Clary@clary_co·May 31, 2017Delhi is calculating what Canberra & DC will do in formulating its policy, but Canberra & DC have to assess India's reliability too.11
Tanvi Madan@tanvi_madan·Jun 1, 20171/ i've written abt mutual concerns re reliability http://brook.gs/2bPDqWp. but wldn't call this "fickle" since hadn't signed up to this145
Arvind Virmani@dravirmani·Jun 1, 2017Impression in India is that Australia's Asia (Ch,Ind) policy tended to change with every PM (even from same party)