I think there was some Russian guy who said sending a nuclear blast into Nevada would be a sign to the US that Russia is serious. I got my will done today just in case.
-
-
-
Found the clip https://youtu.be/9T_5dBMcKL8 good to know we have sane people on both sides.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is the worst idea I’ve heard. I’d rather send the US Army into Ukraine before doing this, at least then you’ve accomplished something useful before presenting Putin a rationale for a nuclear strike.
-
not sure the context of the original excerpt but if they mean a tactical nuclear blast in Ukraine, I say while we're busy nuking reindeer or whatever in Siberia, we send the jets in to finish off whatever's left of them in Ukraine
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not aim at international waters off the coast of Siberia?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I once had a no-kidding, former SAC missile officer, name brand IR PhD, published-about-nukes-in-the-NYT expert, explain to me the doctrinally correct response to a small volley of nukes *aimed*at*the*USA*. The correct answer was so bat**** crazy I’m still not sure I believe it.
-
Launch On Warning?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What should NATO/US’ response be to a “small nuclear blast”? What’s the de-escalatory move? (Besides not firing another nuke into the wilds of Siberia)
-
There is no “de-escalatory” response to nuclear weapons use that preserves any semblance of balance. One would expect full/maximal economic sanctions as a starting point and actions up to limited regional war with Russia as being on the table— nuclear use wouldn’t be tolerated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.