You could be a redistributionist about capital and resist “redistrobution of sex” by saying there is no such thing as sexual capital, there are just workers and consumers
-
Show this thread
-
The trouble is (in broad strokes) there’s no seizable capital for professions like psychology either, but those fighting for social justice will no doubt argue everybody should have needs-based equal access
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
So, you could argue that professionalized sex workers, employed by The State would have their services granted by bureau decision based on need or whatnot
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
But this probably offends most everybody’s notions of sexual consent just the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Not to mention self esteem and intimacy and so on are human needs that require more of a sexual investment than a per se sex worker is capable of
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
As a practical matter that is. Not saying they are incompetent, just, a wife isn’t really a sex worker
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Once you go down the “fuck you, incel, you haven’t earned this basic human need,” congratulations, you’re your favorite reactionary lol. Good luck with all this everyone 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.