It’s pretty simple. The way to discredit someone’s research, is to provide counter-research and academically sound counter-argument. Not get signatures and rely on weight of numbers while providing no supporting evidence. If his work is bad, it should be easy to prove.
I have just learned that the mob has been successful in getting social scientist Noah Carl fired from his position at Cambridge. The statement from St. Edmund's apologises for the "hurt" caused by his appointment. Read the back-story herehttps://quillette.com/2018/12/07/academics-mobbing-of-a-young-scholar-must-be-denounced/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
The Rainbow hairs run academia now. If you aren't left of Mao or Stalin, you get booted.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please watch what happens when "social justice" takes over.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Academic freedom used to be protected.
-
It's so fucking weird how dynamics have changed in academia. First people were told to think. Now, instead, people are told what to think. I'm a huge fan of progressivism, and this is anything but. Its sad.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Due process no longer exists, if one steps outside the rule of the mob now. We have a serious problem in our education system, UK.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What's reasonable about pretending right-wing ideas are as good as left-wing ideas? Nothing! Left-wing ideas are better!
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.