Tweets

You blocked @cjowaisas

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @cjowaisas

  1. May 26

    Why is your local library data nerd smiling? 2019 PLS data is out - - while also still dreaming of a consolidated complete PLS with an API

    Undo
  2. May 25
    Undo
  3. Mar 4

    It is not a perfect measure but we hope this might provide some insight into which states have been successful over a longer period of time at securing commitments and whether there are models in those states that can be replicated to increase commitments for participants

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Mar 4

    We are planning on adding new dashbaord features that will hopefully make it easier to see some of these trends at a state level over time, albeit in a simplistic manner at the beginning (think a table of rankings over 5 years and an average rank)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Mar 4

    Although we are doing this at the state level, not a library system level. CA still holds up well in 2017 by this measure also, but drops to #4 overall in commitments (see pic)

    Table from https://uwtascha.shinyapps.io/eRate_dashboard/ showing the funding year 2017 rankings of the top 4 states by the average per entity funding commitments with District of Columbia 1st with $33,851.21; Alaska 2nd with $20,098.78; Indiana 3rd with $19.925.02; and California 4th with $19,794.05
    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Mar 4

    We wondered if this held true if you looked at other ways of measuring besides just total funding commitments. So we started looking at other measures, such as average per entity (in this case this is equivalent to looking at the library outlet level) & also a per capita measure

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Mar 4

    One of the first things I noticed when e-rate dashboard () was up & running was CA had a high percentage of overall funding committed to library entities. On an annual basis, CA often doubled the percentage of the nearest state (see pic)

    Table from https://uwtascha.shinyapps.io/eRate_dashboard/ showing top 4 ranked states in funding year 2017 by the percentage of total library funding commitments with California first with 16.49%, New York 2nd with 6.31%, Indiana 3rd with 5.97%, and Ohio 4th with 4.40%.
    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Mar 4

    Facepalm for when you get your colleague's Twitter handle incorrect - let's try again - talking about e-rate and the great dashboard that my colleague built from the tangled mess of my thoughts to try to see patterns in funding commitments

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Mar 4

    Although we are doing this at the state level, not a library system level. CA still holds up well in 2017 by this measure also, but drops to #4 overall in commitments (see pic)

    Table from https://uwtascha.shinyapps.io/eRate_dashboard/ with funding year 2017 data sorted by the average per entity commitment showing that DC, Alaska, Indiana, and California are the 4 highest states for this measure.
    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Feb 25

    Inspired by the , and are paving the ways for libraries not only in Mexico, but also throughout Latin America and the Caribbean to empower, revolutionise and innovate. Read more:

    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Feb 23

    One of my professional colleagues sent me a library vendor privacy policy last week & asked about some questionable practices in the policy. What came next is a cautionary tale of the murkiness that is library vendor privacy policies in a time of company acquisitions. 🧵

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Feb 23

    The increase, of course, got us thinking - where did that come from? The majority comes from New Mexico - commitments in Category 1 to library entities in the Land of Enchantment increased from $502,414.77 in funding year 2019 to $37,157,597.00 in funding year 2020

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Feb 23

    We see this growth in another summary that is also on the national page that gives us a subcategory breakdown of commitments and you can see the jump in the Data Transmission / Internet Access subcategory

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Feb 8

    "Young, a CIP research fellow and senior research scientist at the Technology & Social Change Group, brought up an important notion about misinformation: Think of it as more than just the falsehood of information. "

    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Feb 7

    Interested in TASCHA research? "This post provides the nitty gritty on the methods and our initial lessons learned and impressions, in the hopes that it’s useful to other researchers or those interested in methods."

    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Jan 5

    Even in urban areas, many homes lack internet access. iSchool researcher Jason Young and collaborators at and are working to bridge the . Their -funded pilot project will expand broadband access in Tacoma:

    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    16 Dec 2020

    I am incredibly excited to announce that after 2 + 1/2 years our research team at + have successfully launched our open source broadband measurement system with + for public libraries. Thanks to ! More here:

    Image above from Murakami-Viz in use at the Pryor Public Library in Oklahoma
    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. 30 Nov 2020

    Colleagues here at , Dr. Jason Young & Renee Lynch, have been doing great work on the ALVA project () - w/ our partners - read their latest papers / research briefs at the project website

    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    16 Nov 2020

    Commune of Kaya agrees to fund a reading camp at the library!

    Undo
  20. 16 Nov 2020

    Free webinar from ALA Intl Relations Round Table "Reaching national impact in Kenya and Namibia: EIFL’s strategy for public library development" -

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·