-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a good thing. I want judges who interpret the law, not judges who try and make law
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And by the way gop and leadership together is an oxymoron.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If by "terrify" you mean "thrill," then yeah.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? You're saying Trump might appoint 37 conservative judges, leaving 142 appointed before his term and that frightens you? Why--you wanted ONLY liberal social activist judges? There shouldn't be ANY of those. Judges 'judge' fairly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sadly, those who celebrate racism against people of color totally miss a big part of the agenda. These justices favor the rich, the employers. Working people are harmed by recent rulings—and it will only get worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

