You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The problem that I have with DeOldify is that in the end it is nonsense. It may give the illusion of how that particular scene looks in colour. But in all likelihood the result will be completely historically inaccurate. I think it has its place, though. It can look amazing.
DeOldify being "completely historically inaccurate" is an obvious overstatement. The model has no problems with things like skin, grass, sky, fruits/vegetables, flowers, metals, etc. All I want is a little nuance in debates these days. Less extremes.
The conversions are incredible mate. Nothing's ever going to be 100% accurate. Keep plugging away and ignore the noise.
Wait. You mean you haven’t trained your model on high resolution undamaged color versions of the photos everyone is deoldifying?
It does not have to be historically correct. This claim cannot be fulfilled. But it brings the past closer to all non-historians. This is great and you deserve it.
As long as there is either a watermark or it is clearly explained that the image has been colourized, it should be okay. But I get criticism from historians that it doesn't paint an accurate picture, just a guess. I am sure you will continue to improve DeOldify!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
