2/ Admittedly, this surprised me somewhat: "On the internet these images, she says, “come unmoored” from how and why they were made, and how and why they were changed. She has already had students submitting essays which include falsely colourised images without realising it. "
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ I assume that means AI colorized given the context. The surprise comes chiefly from the fact that I didn't think they were at the point of being so convincing as to fool people to that extent. This isn't me fishing for compliments LOL.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My thoughts too! Lowering the cost of entry to learn engage with historical content seems a great thing to do
End of conversation
-
-
-
I can only imagine if "someone" was thinking about integrating 2D to 3D conversion into their service
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem that I have with DeOldify is that in the end it is nonsense. It may give the illusion of how that particular scene looks in colour. But in all likelihood the result will be completely historically inaccurate. I think it has its place, though. It can look amazing.
-
DeOldify being "completely historically inaccurate" is an obvious overstatement. The model has no problems with things like skin, grass, sky, fruits/vegetables, flowers, metals, etc. All I want is a little nuance in debates these days. Less extremes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just came across this. I found this article and your work fascinating. I teach Photo History at Palomar College in SD and will asking my students to write about this in class. Would love to talk more or set up a talk through school. What is the best way to contact you?
-
Cool! You can DM me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.