2/ That is to say...don't keep @ and replying to manual colorists with this stuff. It's annoying, and quite frankly offensive. Thanks!
Show this thread
1/ Hey DeOldify users: I've said this before and I'll say it again- DeOldify by itself does not come close to the quality of manual work, artistically nor historically. It's a nice tool to quickly generate something more relatable and is an interesting exercise in AI art.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How come Deoldify still photos can often look like color photo or manual colorization but Deoldified video as seen on YouTube anyway has washed appearance like 1920s two-strip Technicolor?
-
It's a conscious trade-off- stability between frames came at the price of vividness. There's ways to improve this situation (greatly) but I just haven't had the time to do it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't understand what they want. DeOldify is a fascinating AI-tool, providing a possible, but not necessarily authentic version of colored reality in a quick&easy way. Great to experiment. Manual colorizers have another approach, work effort, meaning and scientific quality.
-
It's like AI-Voices. Even if the quality is already very high, you will want to use human voice actors for usual cinematographic approach. For me, a one-man-studio making short movies with (at most) 0 budget and without ROI, just for sake of art, AI-voices are inevitable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.