So mistaken that it's "not even wrong." I love you man, but you have some weird mindsets about business. Like I said, I don't expect anyone to change their minds. But people pay for a service, not for code. And a service can't be so easily replicated.
-
-
But all tech companies do keep certain things a trade secrets. That's the nature of business. There is no way a business can be completely open.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Point to at least a dozen companies that have died by being too open, and I'll be happy to change my mind. Until then, this is simply a line that companies would have you believe. Especially in a big company context, *no one* cares about the code! Even UnrealEngine is open now.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The other perspective: Two people teams that can't afford a regular army of lawyers- success stories? Unreal Engine is great and I feel like it's the only example I can think of that fits your ideal other than perhaps Red Hat. But they're big. Others....?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yeah, size matters. Epic Games begin to get a share of revenue off of games after a certain amount of revenue is made. They can easily go for someone who doesn't comply with that. But for a small business it's not easy to use that kind of model.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Cowards. You're all worried that someone's going to come along and do your own work better than you can, or steal your little secrets that don't really matter in the long run. Have some faith in your work! The internet will be happy to hound a company that breaks your license.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Open source is for large companies that need a community of experts around their tech stack from which they can recruit. They don't open source for charity or kindness it's a trick.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ChombaBupe @theshawwn and
Android OS is open source for a reason.pic.twitter.com/uOljRCtrdP
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Scientists make their work available for others to use. Why? Doesn't it matter? Especially when we profess to be machine learning researchers (in some sense)?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theshawwn @ChombaBupe and
You're all basically advocating for "Take what you want, take advantage of anyone who's stupid enough to make their code public, and then close off your own work so that no one can build on it." Am I wrong?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I mean.... I put a year's worth of my work up for free and I'm not ragretting it. So no....it's not quite like that.... People seem to forget that part.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.