Prediction: This project never goes anywhere, and no one gets to play with it except him. (I speak from experience. Any time I refuse to open source something, it never ends up mattering and no one ends up getting to toy with it but me. It's always been a mistake.)https://twitter.com/quasimondo/status/1273734015854555143 …
-
-
Replying to @theshawwn
I fear that those non-sharing-shaming spells do not work on me. And your prediction has already kind of failed given that I got commissioned for work in the past based on previous iterations of this project.
1 reply 0 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @quasimondo
I've given up trying to change people's minds on this, so this certainly wasn't a shame-to-change attempt. (I'm not into the whole "shame people for X" anyway.) It's just a recognition of a truth that took me a long time to learn. And to appreciate.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @theshawwn
For the way I work there is no reward for sharing my code - I am neither a teacher, not a developer, nor a startup who do benefit from the additional attention a popular repository gives them. My "USP" is that I make things that at least for a short while not many others can do.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @quasimondo
And when you die, your work will die with you. Is that really what you want? What do you want out of life? I think about that a lot. Is it really just a rat race until the end? There must be more.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @theshawwn
Not sure if you noticed that I make art and my hope is that some of that will still be around when I am gone.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @quasimondo
I noticed. I like it a lot. Your code is art too, though, even if you don't seem to think so. I appreciated the way your covid simulator worked.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @theshawwn
The code is part of my art. If there was a code of honor in art where plagiarists and copycats are called out, - like for example in stand-up comedy - I would share more. But since even curators and critics in this field get constantly fooled by charlatans I choose obscurity.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @quasimondo
Sure, that's fair. But ask yourself: why do you care so much about plagiarists and copycats? They're irrelevant. Everyone knows you made the work first, just like everyone knows
@citnaj made deoldify.5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
And he's absolutely right about the scam artists. Truth is they really are just sitting there waiting for that low hanging fruit to take from well meaning suckers.
-
-
Replying to @citnaj @quasimondo
What is there to say? You're simply mistaken. It's just not true. Scam artists are usually incompetent. They don't matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theshawwn @quasimondo
I thought I remember a connection here... "Mario Klingemann, an artist known for using machine learning, told the Times that "Edmond de Belamy" was like "a connect-the-dots children's painting."https://www.cnet.com/news/ai-made-portrait-sells-at-christies-auction-for-432500/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.