Jason Antic

I think ironically he might be right, but for a wrong reason - they are going to tank the economy, make people die, lose jobs etc. - but to save interest of the top 0.01% - shareholders - that are both not productive, as well as insanely expensive to maintain.

I get the argument much like I get what eugenics proponents think they're achieving. I'm not even saying the argument is wrong from a technical sense. It's just way past that line of absurdity for me in terms of how far you're willing to go to ignore your conscience.

Feudal way of thinking. It wont fly in modern society regardless of whether it s capitalism or whatever

It’s weird that a lot of the replies are claiming the virus will “kill children.” I thought it was established that kids <10 were almost impervious, and <20 has very little risk.

1/ Just saw this: "Young children were more at risk of serious illness than older children were. The proportion of severe and critical cases was 10.6 % for children younger than 1 year, 7.3% for those 1 to 5, 4.2% for those 6 to 10, 4.1% for those 11 to 15, and 3.0%

This happens if you use “the market” not as a tool to generate prosperity for all, but as a religion by itself.