1/ I just stopped reading the book Atomic Habits after page 15. Why? Well, in the first chapter a narrative is pumped up about how the British Cycling team was turned around with a coach that instilled tiny 1% improvements/habits sprinkled here and there that added up
-
Show this thread
-
2/ to something much bigger: An unprecedented streak of wins over the past decade. Then you see the asterix at the bottom of the page: "As this book was going to print, new information about the British Cycling team has come out. You can see my thoughts at
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
3/ http://atomichabits.com/cycling ." First thought was "yep...drugs". I go there, and to paraphrase- "yep, drugs..but the chapter isn't about that anyway lol". So basically, the narrative is destroyed, but rather than fixing the book, you'll instead put a footnote in that you hope
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
4/ most readers will ignore. And then you'll still parade this narrative around well after publication. That's shameless. So this book goes on top of a growing pile of books I regret buying, and they all seem to revolve around the same thing: Telling stories >> evidence.
2 replies 1 retweet 33 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @citnaj
This is exactly how I feel. It poisons the brain with bad data too.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @migueldeicaza
Yep! I really try to be careful about that too with a sort of habit of "information sanitation" in mind. Falsehoods heard repeatedly enough become hard to distinguish from reality, no matter how smart you are.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @citnaj
Miguel de Icaza Retweeted Miguel de Icaza
Found my earlier tweet! https://twitter.com/migueldeicaza/status/1048564562134519808?s=20 … plus some specifics on my favorite author to criticize for this practice: http://www.chabris.com/ChabrisGladwellReviewWSJ.pdf …
Miguel de Icaza added,
Miguel de Icaza @migueldeicazaFunny. Gladwell is the reason I have a policy of stopping reading books when the flaws are too bad. I don’t need to pollute my memory with bad facts and ideas. Memory can’t sustain a barrage of attacks of junk. https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1048366592583716870 …Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Great tweet! Yeah we've converged to the same exact conclusion then.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.