Retweeting because I'm curious as to others' thoughts on this. I can change my mind but I'm just not convinced. I reiterate my position in comment (it's too risky for a bootstrapped startup to try, basically).https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1231561284035833856 …
-
I love the tech. Have you considered a free version that adds a watermark? With an option to pay to have the watermark removed if people like the colorized image generated.
We were indeed considering that with our own app (if that happens). We're still not certain if it's a great idea though. Running these servers costs a lot of money. Encouraging lots free users to run up costs? We've seen that go bad elsewhere with DeOldify based apps.
-
-
The prohibitive cost of computing costs for DL is problematic for freemium strategies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From a user perspective it's an incredible step forward, but it isn't quite reliable enough to justify signing up for a subscription yet. E.g. I tried this photo earlier in the week. The grass, the ball, the shorts, both men and the background are flawless. But... (1/?)pic.twitter.com/xRV2oCqE8d
-
... unfortunately the team these guys played for were green and white, but it's being rendered as blue, which is so frustrating. If I had an option to fine tune that I'd be entering my card details instead of tweeting you. And I realise that if you can square this circle (2/?)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.