Retweeting because I'm curious as to others' thoughts on this. I can change my mind but I'm just not convinced. I reiterate my position in comment (it's too risky for a bootstrapped startup to try, basically).https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1231561284035833856 …
-
-
Replying to @citnaj
For deoldify, I think to a large extent, the research is the product. I don't see another competitive moat there, at least yet. So giving away the research seems like a dangerous step.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @jeremyphoward
Yes, this is exactly how I see it. Don't get me wrong....I'd like to show everyone what was done and in fact I've had a lot of back and forth with
@danasday on this. It wasn't a decision taken lightly.1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
There are many reasons a company open sources some of its software. In your case, it seems you can't articulate the reason. But let me give you one good reason. It's a trojan horse. You want other businesses to integrate your software which gives you an upsell opportunity.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @citnaj and
Your play should be to maximize the number of use cases that may require colorization. It is likely that you know what these are and only potential customers may know.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @citnaj and
I would work to make it as frictionless as possible to use your model. The less effort it takes for a potential customer to integrate, the more likely you have a future sale.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
That's a great point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.