It's not "lose".. It's more, like, artificially select? :) One could even say, eliminate some? And let the remaining ones become more intense? It's sad fun: you spot a verified account that is like "RD is right", and the comments are all "libtards are anti-science". Fine people.
I get Richard's point but if you ever wanted to lose an audience on Twitter, this is the way to do it lolhttps://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512 …
-
-
-
LOL yes that's exactly the filter that's being applied here. It really makes me wonder what Richard is thinking. It seems like a pattern with him though lately and it's weird.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not even an accurate point... e.g. breeding hasn't produced smarter dogs, and even if it had, it would take several times longer if dog generation times were as long as humans... and it's been 15,000 years already for dogs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.