1/ Colorization of the past is almost necessarily an "art" as there's often no one right answer that can be determined. Sure...there was an actual known truth at some point but you have to ask yourself- is that last 3% worth 30,000% of the research effort?https://twitter.com/citnaj/status/1220503865692344320 …
-
-
The new DeOldify looks *very* good. Even the 'mistakes' look natural, like they are a question of lighting, as opposed to mismatched segmentation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love your perspective and the project. Now, what did the lunar landing party actually see vs. The video presented to the world within the limited technology of the time?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Definitely agree. Humans make up reality every day, I don't see why a model should be 100-fold more reliable than them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for sharing this Jason! I suddenly felt a connection to my grandfather, whom I never got to meet, when I saw him in color. (Obvs, that’s little me on the right.) Mind blowing...
pic.twitter.com/fhSYSQUpFP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I completely agree with your stance on the subjective nature of the outcome. From an academic perspective and commercial application is where you are getting the blowback I suspect. This is an all around awesome use of ML.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.