2/ So if you're curious that's basically my stance: I care about historical accuracy, but I'm also practical and just want to make cool things and maybe even pretend I'm doing AI art for a bit. If it's pleasing to the eyes- that's a win in my book!
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel inverse problems have that characteristic. I think that's the reason why a lot of DL practice can be v. artistic. The same is true for math actually, you often have no right path to get to a solution, and you have to keep chiseling it till you get to something "pleasing".
-
Of course colourization has the direct visual aspect to it, which makes that characterization more direct. But I often feel art arises out of optimization (according to some objective function -- visually pleasing, surprise, succinctness) of some ill posed inverse problem. :))
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Some look like ass, some look alright, some might look more interesting than original. Even for artistic model it would make sense to showcase it. But people caught on to use DeOldify for art already, so you did good regardless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.