2/ I took two linear algebra courses in college and quite frankly I still can’t tell you confidently what an eigenvector or eigenvalue is. Calculus I thought was easier and more intuitive. Writing and reading (especially Philosophy)- loved it. Easy A.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ I do think writing skills overlap quite a bit in what makes up a big chunk of effective programming and even ML problem solving. And that is to take complex ideas and distill/organize them effectively.
Show this thread -
4/ In fact if you can’t do this, you wind up burying yourself in your own mess of complexity quite quickly. You rapidly use up what little prescious mental resources you have to work with the problem (working memory, for example). You wind up tripping over your own feet.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not great with maths? This statement blows my mind a bit. I mean, Im guessing you understand the below shenanigans?pic.twitter.com/U2hEbAfBoT
-
I’m able to read stuff like that slowly and carefully and try to get the core intuition out of it. But it’s a real chore and it’s certainly not comfortable. I was even a math minor and did well but played the game for grades more than solid understanding.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The language matters. This applies to spoken languages, too. OpenQASM and Korean Hangeul are quite elegant, while R and certain spoken languages (lines and circles everywhere) would be challenging, if not impossible, to beautify. I've never seen hard-to-read OpenQASM.
-
Yeah I do subscribe to the belief language itself shapes the way we think of things. I think of how clumsy Roman numerals are compared to Arabic, for example.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.