It’s for solving real problems. I think you’re doing it right as long as you don’t treat it as the only solution (where everything looks like a nail with your hammer).
Show this thread
Exactly. To me and I’d bet most others in the field machine learning is just a powerful tool to enable new things that weren’t previously doable. Acting like it’s a wasted effort because you don’t think it’ll lead to AGI is just silly. It’s not just about AGI.https://twitter.com/tdietterich/status/1203189592712568832 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok, but I can't really see any reason why deep learning won't (some day in the "distant" future) lead to something that can be called human-like intelligence. CNN already approximate human visual cortex, reinforcement learning already produces human-like strategies to win games.
-
And deep learning is just 7 years old, imagine the breadth it'll have when it will become a "mature" discipline with solid software engineering principles embedded into it and universally recognized.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.