Are you blogging?
I don’t care much about papers for my own work because my non-academic career simply doesn’t depend on it. I just want to get the ideas out there and let the code and results speak for themselves. And then continue on with the cool work!https://twitter.com/mrocklin/status/1195550564303532032 …
-
-
-
There was this that I co-wrote with Jeremy Howard and Uri Manor of Salk back in May: https://www.fast.ai/2019/05/03/decrappify/ … . And I’d consider the DeOldify GitHub readme a write up. There’s a lot more to talk about that I plan on putting out there but it’s quality >> quality in my mind.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The interesting thing is, for people that care to think about these things, peer review journals are almost certainly a net negative for science. The whole process is an unfortunate historical artefact from after the Second World War. 1/2
-
Sadly, most people haven't thought about the topic of peer review hard enough, and almost everyone in science just keeps ploughing ahead with it. 2/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.