So you're saying @ReyosB doesn't understand? Which of his tweets' statements were incorrect - and why?
Don't try the "I'm superior to you because I understand how medical science works and you don't" approach while ignoring his valid comments.
It makes you look pretentious/dumb.
Okay, I just need to ask this. Was anyone in this thread arguing that circumcision is a good thing? because from what I've read it seems that everyone is on the same page here, yet there's a back-and-forth going on.
-
-
I've provided two systematic reviews which indicate benefits of male circumcision. They were ignored, in much the same way that research justifying vaccines is ignored.
-
And we're really not on the same page here. This science denying moron ignores systematic review of clinical research. You fucks are dumber that half the anti-vaxx people I've met, and that's saying something.
-
We're not on the same page here. Because: 1) You are clearly of the opinion that all systematic reviews are beyond criticism. 2) You (had) no knowledge of the principle author's reputation for statistical manipulation, bias and constant self-referencing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.