it seems unlikely theres a defensible notion of what an artist/work 'deserves' under which theres a redistribution of attention that gets everyone there
-
-
im saying this all in kind of a weird way bc i still imagine my interlocutor mishearing it as 'theres too much new stuff' or 'if you want an audience then obey the market'
Show this thread -
all i mean is what imaginary interlocutor advocates is literally not possible, so what is supposed to happen. but i suppose it doesnt really matter when any appeal is at most a tiny nudge toward it. and theres a lot of room to uncontroversially improve distribution/discovery so
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.