-
New conversation
-
-
-
“We’re taking the high ground on data integrity by falsely reporting data” 1. That will increase the number of trans people for the purpose of the census. 2. By 30 people and a massive pile of socks. 3. ?????? 4. Mattresses for all! Profit!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m just so confused?? What did they think trans people did before?? They’ll just end up with worse data if they took it out


-
They think trans people were invented in 2014.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We are concerned about the validity of the data being collected so our plan is to destroy the validity of the data being collected. Go team!
-
"Our hypothesis is that this will interfere with the validity of the data! ...so we'll mess with the data deliberately to prove we were "right all along"."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why, how, do they have this much of a problem with this question, surely this suits their sex not gender dogwhistly-pedant-fetish

-
It’s literally an optional question that isn’t meant for them. They want accurate data on how many females there are, no? I love this


- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's a whole lot of logos used, what would be easier to just say "We're Transphobic Bigots", but same difference, no?
-
I wonder how many of those "organizations" are run by the same group chat
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
