-
-
-
anyway I repeatedly tried to engage with Singal and like all of the !!many!! people who have done so I found he was in fact not interested in anything other than pretending people can’t offer reasons for their objections to his work
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Philosophers who are not partisans in the specific Twitter-wars going on in philosophy" - so, like, they don't have a philosophy? Is not being silent/neutral taking a side? I feel like it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Philosophers not on Twitter have more important things to do, answering the tough questions likepic.twitter.com/VK0lfsKeOX
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nonpartisan Not-On-Twitter Philosophy Twitter, one of the most toxic communities on-off here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
meanwhile, drawing inferences and denouncing people from online is bad. Except when he does it.pic.twitter.com/HaxAnLdmwo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As someone who's dealt many tech-averse academics, the real opinion of philosophers not on Twitter about Twitter is: A) What's Twitter? B) Oh no is this like when I had to learn Email? C) Technology is evil for the following 72 reasons D) No thanks. I'm quite busy at the moment
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
imagine being proud of being a neutral on human rights.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what do you mean Brian leiter has no stake in twitter wars i thought he was the enemy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


