-
-
I do think we should be avoid false certainty about these questions. But there is a lot of data that informs us about these issues. If you want to dismiss this data for ad hominem reasons, I can't stop you.
-
But then, by that logic, you should apply the same "never speak again" standard to the leftists who got Corbyn and the 2018 midterms wildly wrong.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Attacking the previous predictions of the author does not address the substance of his current argument.
-
I think the future is deeply unknowable, is what I think. And confident pronouncements on them are largely worthless.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
FWIW,in hindsight Trump won because the places he was extreme hit a sweet spot to bring in a group that was trending away from Ds without alienating too many traditional Rs. The danger in Sanders (and Warren) is that he does the opposite,and alienates suburbanites Ds rely on now.
-
yes, that's exactly the danger and I don't think it's not a real one! But I think you can point out similar dangers for the other major candidates.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Stunt on em, Chris Hayes
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What an accurate description, not just of Chait, but a whole genre of liberal elites in DC and NY.pic.twitter.com/UDT1VGvOCq
Ovo je potencijalno osjetljiv multimedijski sadržaj. Saznajte više
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.