Still doesn't change the fact that they were trying to have a positive impacthttps://twitter.com/chrisiousity/status/1058487899933589504 …
"Tainted money" is used as a shorthand here. This explains various ways it can happen.https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2010/03/21/when-a-donor-becomes-tainted/ …
-
-
So, basically it'd be the first which is that Ralph is an asshole, but I'd still like verification that it was St. Jude's choice, because if it is the
@WSJ's doing that it is evil and they're making sure that kids aren't getting donations so they can be moral arbiters. That's... -
... where I personally stand on this issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.