2/ With that said, I don't get why the media or the public cares. It's just summarizing to 100 people what is in a public document that I gather is quickly read by tens of thousands of people. Sort of quirky that it gets attention when substance is same as in the document.
In any event, neither of those are prepared by the justices, so they’re irrelevant to this discussion. I think reading a dissent matters b/c the justices have rare, formal outlets for sharing their views with the world. This is one.
-
-
I'm not sure they have only rare formal outlets for sharing their views with the world about the Court's cases, though, in that they get unlimited words to write anything they want, that anyone can then read. Shouldn't obviously matter if it's written or oral, at least to me.
-
Agreed, but that audio lasts. It exists. Just listened to RBG’s Ledbetter dissent in the documentary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.