This seems ... not well advised.https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/995088584221839360 …
Heh. I didn't even say "ill advised." I just said "not well advised."
-
-
Chris I get it, I do get your point, I’m not hard headed, hell look at the travel ban exhibit A. Just think the default these days is always negative and the media as a whole omit an awful lot.
-
Seems Makam Delrhaim, DOJ Anti-Trust, would agree it’s ill advised given his affidavit stated suit was filed “without political consideration”.
-
The President speaking on the topic doesn’t automatically constitute it’s political. It was a statement of fact. You folks are making assumptions as it suits your narrative to “get” Trump.
-
No, it’s the opposite — as I’ve detailed previously but you just don’t seem to care — and the reason why the president generally does not comment on ongoing enforcement litigation.
-
Trump’s tweet does not indicate action from himself but rather that “Administration’s Anti-Trust Division”. THEY are who’s opposed in the context of the tweet. Second it addresses why the MEDIA are not stating the division’s stance. It’d be different if he said “I” he didn’tpic.twitter.com/JDGHvSAoBS
-
In fact, he does say “Trump Administration’s Anti-Trust Division”. Hope everyone enjoys their weekend.
-
…man you better tell all these left leaning sites about that, they used the same phrase as did Obama. Because they had no F’ing clue it mean impropriety. Pro-Tip: it’s easier to be honest and just say you hate Trump and want to erase the election.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/will-the-obama-administration-stop-comcast-from-buying-time-warner/457239/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.