There are no coincidences in politics.
-
-
-
That ... doesn’t in any way respond to my comment. It not being a coincidence actually would lead more toward it being sloppy — because there’s a big body of evidence that they’re just sloppy in their news releases.
-
Odd how their "sloppiness" always points towards intent and what they are looking to accomplish.
-
It really doesn't. They screw up press releases constantly, in stupid and meaningless ways.
-
I would agree with you on this if I'd have seen any corrections or retractions from the communications office.
-
What are you talking about? They've had to correct the names of world leaders on White House Press Office statements. But, the larger point is that there have been so many meaningless ones that it's obvious they're just sloppy editing errors.
-
Anyway, this is a silly conversation since I know my point is an obvious one. I'm off to do work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've got 100 rubles on sloppy editing (it's impossible to lose money betting on sloppy editing with this WH)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given this WH’s history with lack for proof reading, have to think it is just sloppy editing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pathetically, this administration's spelling is sloppy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.