However, as more and more comes out, either Hannity is totally misrepresenting the relationship or Cohen’s lawyers were using what amounted to a nominal third “client” as the basis for seeking additional protections before Judge Wood for the items seized.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#FoxNews is still sorting out the#truth. This could take awhile .....................................pic.twitter.com/SAtHN9bZ9Z
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If there is a potential conflict with an existing client (Trump) then Cohen needs to have asked Hannity to waive it with informed written consent. If Cohen did not - Hannity has to enter the case. IMO Hannity cannot exert priv to any matter that touches Trump
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They don't even know what they're defending him against. They have no idea what the SDNY has on Hannity now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, absolutely right. But Hannity and Fox "didn't get the memo." Hard to fathom how they mixed up their signals so badly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.