-
Show this thread
-
Chris Geidner Retweeted Rebecca Ballhaus
Hannity acknowledges it:https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/985955301760397319 …
Chris Geidner added,
8 replies 69 retweets 203 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted Sean Hannity
This is from early in the campaign:https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/630834524243427328 …
Chris Geidner added,
7 replies 63 retweets 150 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted PickUpTheVoiceMailMomHat
Chris Geidner added,
1 reply 18 retweets 110 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted
This is a situation where unnamed sources are not all that helpful, imho, due to the varying motives of different parties right now: https://twitter.com/DianneG/status/985962602533711872 …
Chris Geidner added,
This Tweet is unavailable.7 replies 27 retweets 101 likesShow this thread -
"We definitely had attorney-client privilege because I asked him for that ... I never used Michael [Cohen] in any case that involved me and a third party." - Sean Hannitypic.twitter.com/zPP1Mmlic2
57 replies 88 retweets 149 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted southpaw
Chris Geidner added,
southpaw @nycsouthpawIf this description of their relationship is accurate, then there shouldn't be loads of privileged files to worry about. There probably wouldn't be any files, aside from idk--a few emails with theoretical questions, right? https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/985969661786447873 …Show this thread8 replies 20 retweets 125 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted andrew kaczynski
Chris Geidner added,
3 replies 35 retweets 158 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted Sean Hannity
So, as
@nycsouthpaw said earlier, either this is not accurately portraying the relationship, or there are basically no A-C privileged files at issue — which would undermine the argument Cohen's lawyers are trying to make in court.https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/985970632201564161 …Chris Geidner added,
21 replies 108 retweets 273 likesShow this thread -
The salient question is why a judge would order his name in particular be released, other than to promulgate salacious gossip and attempt to endanger Hannity’s employment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
1. She didn't know the name. 2. As I've been discussing all day, the 2nd Circuit standard for the identity of a client itself being privileged — as detailed in the case cited by Cohen's lawyers — clearly did not appear to be met here.
-
-
It seems unusual that a judge would insist on having a name released to the press where ANY privileged communication with an attorney had occurred, short of an indictment. This smacks of simply punishing friends of
@POTUS and worse.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.