This is a key question, have Trump/Cohen's efforts to try this publicly led them to go far afield of the types of arguments that might be more persuasive to a judge?https://twitter.com/eorden/status/985948253400326144 …
-
-
"We definitely had attorney-client privilege because I asked him for that ... I never used Michael [Cohen] in any case that involved me and a third party." - Sean Hannitypic.twitter.com/zPP1Mmlic2
Show this thread -
So, as
@nycsouthpaw said earlier, either this is not accurately portraying the relationship, or there are basically no A-C privileged files at issue — which would undermine the argument Cohen's lawyers are trying to make in court.https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/985970632201564161 …Show this thread -
Back to the matter in court, Trump's lawyer makes it clear that she believes the case should be treated differently because the president's personal lawyer and materials relating to the president are involved:https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/985974679268667392 …
Show this thread -
Back to Cohen and Hannity. Hannity's latest tweets and the letter from Cohen's lawyers this morning appear to contradict. Can you explain,
@seanhannity?pic.twitter.com/0WQfrc5Biq
Show this thread -
Back to court, where Wood has not yet decided on whether she'll appoint a special master, after calling the SDNY US Atty's Office taint team procedure a "viable option."https://twitter.com/PPVSRB/status/985981921502158848 …
Show this thread -
Here is
@ambiej’s must-read thread on what happened in court today —>https://twitter.com/ambiej/status/986007655616565248?s=21 …Show this thread -
And our updated story: https://www.buzzfeed.com/amberjamieson/michael-cohen-manhattan-court …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, if that were actually the case, Hannity wouldn't qualify as a client. So, the "sources" here are trying their hardest to protect Hannity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not only that, but if you are paying off a porn actress through an attorney, is that something you'd likely tell a lot of people? Or, anyone?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And given what Sean Hannity later released as his statement, it appears likely those anonymous sources were probably Sean Hannity and perhaps his spokesman. Useless.https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/985963508796936192 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only reason Sean Hannity's name came up is bc Cohen is claiming that SDNY has documents or something that relate to Hannity. So...yeah.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ass covering, plain and simple. There is more to this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unnamed sources are "not all that helpful" when they don't push your narrative. LOL.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.